From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding icon sets to Emacs -- and next steps for icons.el Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:10:07 +0300 Message-ID: <19836bad-89c6-b8e6-6a09-f3be5f97ce77@yandex.ru> References: <87h721aaip.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8841"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 To: Payas Relekar , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 24 20:11:55 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQur5-00027u-5K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 20:11:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQur3-0001aN-PQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQupd-0007qx-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:10:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]:36418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQupb-0001b7-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:10:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id d16so16458080wrr.3 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc; bh=wtpQBF1YPNUWKwljk2pRFnM2jV8hdHyUgCLLt0RqfmE=; b=IxmmmsVPGYqS7uNLBeVOnUdS8qyx0FF5SvJYiZGBl/wGLa/th6H1IN3th23nkT0ZSh jntOvOKELxU+XnCgg1FEi9siqU1n9YuPZVJEGPzNXiUyQCnTdae51OmgWvZVLsEPrpIy SJi8/8Mpd0qfbyKW33+I+Z6vnzgwftudKt6Rlrnb6eQwISAZlqiXxbVBbL8I38gbP1H/ oIe7n0blbIAls2RqeDaoQPzwiZmtsLoU1vX1XVVybW0v1f1AOGZI2IilwwpCSIyKsQyJ wuQM8K1ivipHpijmZlHILQqn4FrqWhPDzXqFb/f5iDwCdmxg0CZluDOlbA2atalgoxEV hbQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=wtpQBF1YPNUWKwljk2pRFnM2jV8hdHyUgCLLt0RqfmE=; b=m276dmz0TnivkkY9LKaUndTHjrfMIW/H/kyZKqG95jOqAl9lleb+OV4aVc188cgZ7X 5DE/SdAjD5ZATaP6kMx2wcwRZ+mjbmdIh8gDPY4yWC0240PINPgJf9NaKt6oWAQiNBm1 5JsVGa3tamdTqnQWlv0hFQPFwhtPMeEqCuUH0+TZPyjp4YP3qukvX+5FNQelxgtnFkiX YGuAruKxMYnBIrZCZZOHzGn78igasdzUNYN6jFCtQ9/dIuuytEsOhm2IqN9qw+UUyl5s B4D6dDR0YXgTZOEdMskngOlv8vTMT7ISOawOn3eoCIkyji5Xa/zNu1MYBtA1A/bdDlQa x0cA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1HY6/HTujWgTuuRBu45TykuqY3FcY7Fgqaxnia7PRATWV543nV pyk2hYotOf4oWRL5qtPLkUU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7K5qjdGS8hEK1jIaP7DMjodlVpYp0DwBpp2IGvU+qRvOpL6JIdyw7wGh1Jyffdk68dlwaKUg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a84:0:b0:225:20ed:872b with SMTP id o4-20020a5d4a84000000b0022520ed872bmr210049wrq.267.1661364612359; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j2-20020a5d4522000000b0022546ad3a77sm12982822wra.64.2022.08.24.11.10.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87h721aaip.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42b; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294046 Archived-At: On 24.08.2022 19:08, Payas Relekar wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> "decent contrast" is a fairly low bar. >> > Yet surprising amount of*modern* software fails to clear it.. > > I'm just glad modus-themes makes 'contrast' issues thing of the past in > Emacs. Now if icons acheive the same feat, I might just enable the > toolbar. I'm very much in favor of good contrast myself (and light background themes). But whatever issues one might find with a black-on-white icon set, low contrast is unlikely to be one of them. Even though I suppose the base background color of the frame also plays a role.