From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags and functions that return structures! Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19645803.87891177441442676.JavaMail.www@wwinf4103> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177441502 3097 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2007 19:05:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:05:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 21:05:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgQJw-0000Sh-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:05:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgQPT-0004W6-Kn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:10:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgQOd-00041g-25 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgQOb-0003zM-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:09:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgQOb-0003zE-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:09:49 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp2.voila.fr ([193.252.22.175] helo=smtp1.voila.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgQJ2-0001NX-9O; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4112.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B64F71C003D9; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wwinf4103 (wwinf4103 [172.22.152.30]) by mwinf4112.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A7A211C003BE; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:04:02 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070424190402686.A7A211C003BE@mwinf4112.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [86.107.96.49] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69969 Archived-At: > > When we have a function that returns a structure with a name S, by searching the name of that structure (S), find-tag does not jump in all cases to structure's definiton, but to a function's definition that returns that structure. > > I think this depends on the order in which etags sees the struct and > the functions. > > Anyway, when this happens, does "C-u M-." eventually finds the struct > definition? No. It jumps to another function that returns the same structure, even there is the def. of the structure somewhere.