From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uday S Reddy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Locks on the Bzr repository Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:17 +0100 Message-ID: <19568.59349.718000.978281@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <4C6D56DB.7040703@swipnet.se> <4C6D8EC5.7040901@swipnet.se> <4C6E1F0A.7070506@swipnet.se> <837hjlr78p.fsf@gnu.org> <87zkwhtws5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tymppj62.fsf@gnu.org> <871v9t8klf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83lj81pazq.fsf@gnu.org> <83aaogpcbu.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd737pxd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83pqxboi38.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282467837 7925 80.91.229.12 (22 Aug 2010 09:03:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uday S Reddy , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 11:03:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6T3-0004uY-Tv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:03:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On6T3-0007t5-5z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:03:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52098 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On6Sy-0007s1-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6Sw-0000Xo-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: from sun61.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.128.150]:33038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1On6Sw-0000Xc-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 05:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [147.188.128.127] (helo=bham.ac.uk) by sun61.bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1On6Su-0002Km-Pg; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:44 +0100 Original-Received: from mx1.cs.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.192.53]) by bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1On6Su-0006Rh-Fo; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:44 +0100 Original-Received: from gromit.cs.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.193.16] helo=MARUTI.cs.bham.ac.uk) by mx1.cs.bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1On6Su-0004QQ-P2; Sun, 22 Aug 2010 10:03:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.92a under 23.2.1 [EmacsW32 Version 1.58 2010-08-02] (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129018 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > The problem with it, is that I've found Bzr's rebase to be unreliable. Well, what can I say? A "distributed" VCS without rebase is an oxymoron. But there you have it. If Bazaar is a "gnu project", can FSF lean on them to produce a proper integrated rebase? Cheers, Uday