From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uday S Reddy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 09:39:17 +0100 Message-ID: <19546.30901.687000.971249@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <176EDAD3B9E54E39870FA3F84A5DDF3C@us.oracle.com> <19542.56658.583000.394397@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281027876 6230 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2010 17:04:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uday S Reddy , Lennart Borgman , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 05 19:04:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh3ri-00057b-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:04:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh3rY-0003nY-MK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34353 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh2ue-00053O-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh2ud-00047Z-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:03:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sun61.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.128.150]:58813) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh2uc-000473-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [147.188.128.127] (helo=bham.ac.uk) by sun61.bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1OgvzH-0003F9-Mc; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:39:39 +0100 Original-Received: from mx1.cs.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.192.53]) by bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgvzG-00023I-Fw; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:39:38 +0100 Original-Received: from gromit.cs.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.193.16] helo=MARUTI.cs.bham.ac.uk) by mx1.cs.bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1OgvzG-0005H4-Q3; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:39:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.92a under 23.2.1 [EmacsW32 Version 1.58 2010-08-02] (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128300 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > That's one possible interpretation. I don't think it is necessary to > fork Emacs to make it appealing to Windows users, for example. > Improvements can be made, of course. In that case, I would like to understand at least the key binding aspects of this divergence. How do you think Lennart could have changed the key bindings for the needs of W32 users? And, Lennart, if you can follow up please. Cheers, Uday