From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Gildea Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: (declare (debug 0)) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:40:20 -0700 Message-ID: <1948175.1634607620@pental> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2072"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 19 03:41:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mce8P-0000Qq-45 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 03:41:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39518 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mce8O-00006J-1V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 21:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mce7F-0007m7-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 21:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: from tigger.sg.gildea.net ([99.65.78.170]:34436 helo=pental.sg.gildea.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mce7C-0001yW-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 21:40:31 -0400 Original-Received: from pental (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by pental.sg.gildea.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43DD925A04F for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:40:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; Emacs 29.0.50 Content-ID: <1948173.1634607620.1@pental> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=99.65.78.170; envelope-from=stepheng+emacs@gildea.com; helo=pental.sg.gildea.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277332 Archived-At: The node Instrumenting Macro Calls in edebug.texi recommends declaring (debug 0) to specify that none of the macro's arguments should be instrumented. But all examples I could find in Emacs code use (debug nil) for this. Which is it, 0 or nil? If 0 is the preferred specification, should the documentation say what other integers mean?