From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46236: 26.1; explicit the info files installation Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:54:12 +0000 Message-ID: <192e82f20f3b71f5def0@heytings.org> References: <875z3bq3p6.fsf@host.localdomain> <83fszkqacg.fsf@gnu.org> <192e82f20f22020cd392@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: marmot-te@riseup.net, 46236@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 21 15:55:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDKC-0007Za-OH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:55:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDKB-00067C-Sa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDJm-0005tL-5P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDJl-0001vH-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:55:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDJl-0001ZK-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46236 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46236-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46236.16190132575953 (code B ref 46236); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46236) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2021 13:54:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDJ3-0001Xw-9B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:54:17 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:47328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZDJ1-0001Xn-14 for 46236@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:54:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1619013253; bh=nyMGgI7oOTs9mSMNbbJZXsLFpM3dJDeWtAxjqNx9aKY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=eTETlWl8qX2gfAtz5AnPhrCXPE3NDf6IT9X4kodU+Wr/EIR5vX1lTx9BMxmQ49TGS 35nr5go9f3CR5fhPsE/twJ1+5GYQmV8hCOK/UPbCmzszuZf+70qXLMZYHoWV8RtK0X +6/FnLRvCUdJDYTuBz4cCLH7iirkH6ELt64F8MZVSiyydcMSm1iJ2Zd7D/UjWNKL8l Ot0RZ+lya5TeUMaEAbKJ4fjMaMefjQRqG2ShJbJKJQvWNvPEQ9nZRrCJwFHR5lBjm1 XR2OqqdEfwJRCgrHXCnXFOh7IgpsaVVLIDIqj7T1OouBvgQx/QZObkTQTLG8NkoCKV Z5/6c4YBMAgkA== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204610 Archived-At: > > But I think the Debian maintainers might be upset, and it would be easy > for them to then disable this functionality. > Why would they be? They already distribute these files in a separate package, so AFAICS they have no reason to prevent their users from doing the same. > > So in some ways, I'd rather that users of Debian complain so that they > fix the root cause: that they don't ship GFDL manuals. OTOH, that is > exceedingly unlikely to happen any time soon. > I fear it is, indeed.