From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#4375: 23.1.50; can't kill killed gud buffer Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:47 +1200 Message-ID: <19112.9315.801126.825982@totara.tehura.co.nz> References: <87ljkp79u1.fsf@tnei.co.uk> <19110.57126.832288.236368@totara.tehura.co.nz> <4AA757B4.7090204@tnei.co.uk> <19111.29024.69183.195599@totara.tehura.co.nz> <5E16B510-DCCD-4E1D-8521-09938048182F@swipnet.se> <19111.36343.669900.640184@totara.tehura.co.nz> Reply-To: Nick Roberts , 4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252534043 26877 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2009 22:07:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org" , Robert Marshall , 4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 10 00:07:15 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MlVJq-0008HK-Rd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:07:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlVJq-0007ax-80 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlVJk-0007ZU-ER for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlVJf-0007YR-Ll for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34624 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlVJf-0007YH-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:56757) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlVJe-0001nU-Ir for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n89M6xiZ023157; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:06:59 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n89M57kM022766; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:05:07 -0700 Resent-Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:05:07 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:05:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 4375 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4375-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B4375.125253335220512 (code B ref 4375); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:05:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4375) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 9 Sep 2009 21:55:52 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (viper.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.25]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n89Ltnc6020506 for <4375@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:55:52 -0700 Original-Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.29.50]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FB63DA9B1; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:48 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9195C164; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:55:47 +1200 (NZST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:07:07 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:30898 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:25030 Archived-At: > > If the release of 23.2 is imminent then I could temporarily move > > gdb-ui.el back from EMACS_23_1_RC for the release. It also has some > > new features, e.g. reverse debugging. > > Even if it's not imminent, it's likely that when it will happen many > people will still be using older GDB releases. So it'd be good to keep > the gdb-ui.el code for Emacs-23.2 (and include the new gdb-mi.el as > well). Emacs 23.1 is always an option for those using older GDB releases. Migrating properly to GDB/MI is not an easy thing to do and I want to focus on that rather than on compatibility with old versions of GDB. Others can work on maintaining compatibility if they wish but it will make the code a lot more complicated. > BTW, as you probably already know, I really think that M-x gdb should Do > the Right Thing, whether gdb is run with --annotate=2, --annotate=3, > or -i=mi. I.e. it should wait to see GDB's output and then decide based > on that output whether to use gdb-mi.el or gdb-ui.el or just gud.el. We used to do that with "--fullname" and "--annotate=3" but that caused problems when execution was started in the users .gdbinit file. The two options are now invoked with separate functions (M-x gud-gdb and M-x gdb). > > Is installing Gdb 7.0 not an option once it has been released? > > I don't understand this question. I wondered what was preventing Jan from using GDB 7.0. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob