From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49057: 28.0.50; windmove-display-in-direction ignores windmove-display-no-select Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:33:40 +0200 Message-ID: <18ae47f5-cf21-571f-f73a-43492ee90f62@gmx.at> References: <20210616064248.mqqzlt7qyxwqrcfy.ref@Ergus> <20210616064248.mqqzlt7qyxwqrcfy@Ergus> <87fsxitdmt.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20210616121632.k365bes37rs5m6sl@Ergus> <87mtrpjtkm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sg1gp8qf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6837"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49057@debbugs.gnu.org, Ergus To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 09:34:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lu91E-0001el-Ea for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:34:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34410 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu91D-0002s1-FC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 03:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59026) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu90s-0002rm-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 03:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lu90s-0001mF-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 03:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lu90s-00070S-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 03:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49057 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 49057-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49057.162400163626906 (code B ref 49057); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 07:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49057) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2021 07:33:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55662 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lu90l-0006zt-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 03:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:39613) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lu90g-0006zV-Jq for 49057@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 03:33:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1624001621; bh=j1GUZVaOaNafdJEKQ34S25hQLUfcFLnBeureIXzBSFk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OkYp8/12aKKbQVbsYE3u2HwSNTg9HMwDUGwmt5nOqVtSxaMzKlX5b6bv86weDk5A8 7V4apdibxgJ9pG1ygShdhjQUKlWuIy55xMNwiobzul77XM9/nii+35zDfcgg2UEDNG c4OiELr/yzt7BzOqL4Wg7LJRcCbpnXFqSZYzKRhA= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.15]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MybGX-1l4nTE30nN-00yzhV; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:33:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sg1gp8qf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:uJAOI5ZuC9tAhFTCdh55iDEqsu1jt4LEn2fwKR0I/1dOSJ/DLaE fPs7EBFQOr+RSMr9eblXvxzTdh1HerMBFWVUH3VYdSu+OXt/Wtv4wvFd1yNe86TGBgHXYal z1ZkH+4x4oYx6QYabF84cWheM2cLJIXP9uhzOswZrGNXVG/swpCSqsuXxDpLjAN9YotRKtI J5sQJgcULnhcDfy6bju0A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:n7E+tibPkIg=:JhrNZBxFMNfbosskBpMAjr bwkJ/EbDd7clY0yvZUqyEWLiT7CC4MR6KL8OFCLxl/rbPty1axzD/In70HHkYPiBsBqcfFYjw qgkR9a/skePGGnaH+4lgMNfr/pyFw3r8LnI1iXYtJru5B8Mt5dgrY08n70sb43s1VVNYqkAfg UwGAugvJUCQkoIQHN28+NhyN+SQZ/xjJwN0yYGZAN5pv+orBtIiT+nAkEskYM3fx3x5+e/Ib7 GuSqE5dMpWnM/x8m1PjsM96nOLL+Hi8gemQhByupCEH6h0RZjXzhJFiNFK5dB6nR5QeQDjxvY CGXIHgLxq+qn1G/Epp19Z9FvGVRRziUUfHE9GMkvSahMBdK4IO36MDywcIfU6D6oYeO3G8kf3 U620hTjYk1chnVtfx1hVGaZKVcIE2ZzbFR8BWZ55fJsvGAZ2O4PVNztl6PesQKRAHRtQy64Md TCAG5VIm3IuhTLphGEPYSmI+AB7N72jYF35OfcADcEk8uvhkT6LT77qEevPPgqHjk0S2+hTc5 +r6bxWwxUi46xkbHeLCUogHwc/rAmYLirJOQa3v/uFd/OcBB3Ge+egfWJ5631vN8UnJwrjE6X qBRx7JaEPV9rgUocpy0rEmg8OE5C9W7/qg4R+JMevTHbHWEQ63WYlPDYf/VAcX7dnC9osRSmH uz0CWQJ4wVJBL7M7ENCxuSVBlI2z67NRStUlmoO6Wn2VNH1+X7dfMcsAvLBJwuNrtPBnv0ZX9 zX0bK0wMbAvYyW5y1fQNOaep+TI+aDa+h8/MUVe1/ZX3UXST4pIBW9VVe/Ujv2pn1eIzkm7d X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208688 Archived-At: > But wouldn't this be too confusing for users, when users will call > `pop-to-buffer' with the new alist entry 'select', and it still will select > the unintended window as `pop-to-buffer' currently does? `pop-to-buffer' has to select the window chosen by `display-buffer' regardless of whether `display-buffer' selected it or not. Do we violate this principle anywhere? The basic difference I'd propose is to have `pop-to-buffer' bind (display-buffer-overriding-action '(nil ((select . t)))) around the `display-buffer' call and so `display-buffer' will select the chosen window regardless of any user customizations. martin