From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: sand@blarg.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs HEAD regressions Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:52:05 -0800 Message-ID: <18826.28789.943303.596345@priss.frightenedpiglet.com> References: <498964C5.5020906@alice.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233809548 19724 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2009 04:52:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 04:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sand@blarg.net To: Angelo Graziosi , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 05:53:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUwFA-00030F-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:53:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58059 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUwDr-0003UB-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:52:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUwDn-0003Tt-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:52:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUwDk-0003Th-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:52:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46002 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUwDk-0003Te-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:52:12 -0500 Original-Received: from v-static-143-234.avvanta.com ([206.124.143.234]:52312 helo=priss.frightenedpiglet.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUwDj-0001u0-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:52:11 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 24472 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Feb 2009 04:52:06 -0000 In-Reply-To: <498964C5.5020906@alice.it> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.11 under Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-URL: http://home.blarg.net/~sand X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108771 Archived-At: Angelo Graziosi writes: > It seems that recently someone [1,2,3] is flagging different problems > with a common base: performance. > > I have tried to reproduce the test case in [3]. In my case, surely I > have misinterpreted something because compiling exits abnormally with > code 127 BUT... Anything that can generate 6kB lines in your complation buffer should do. Try calling a shell script that writes the long line. For me, it was a long compilation line from "make". > with Emacs CVS <= 20090129 15:40 it takes 2 seconds > with current HEAD it takes 11 seconds to exit > > For the record: changing ONLY the new 'emacs' executable with the older, > works just fine. I was also able to narrow it down to around that date. cvs up -D 2009-01-29 works fine with my test case, cvs up -D 2009-01-30 is slow with my test case. The datestamps here are from a machine in the US/Pacific time zone. Derek