From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tyler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How to get rid of *GNU Emacs* buffer on start-up? Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:20:43 -0300 Message-ID: <18657.10891.290294.848437@blackbart.sedgenet> References: <873ajzwoqu.fsf@kobe.laptop> <9bceaf08-4a29-4593-be31-13e3b459763d@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <85myi4u5vw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ej3g2tob.fsf@blackbart.sedgenet> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222716145 22570 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2008 19:22:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Allan Gottlieb Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 29 21:23:23 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KkOL4-0004Ak-Vu for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:23:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46689 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkOK1-0005OD-UF for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkOIK-0003gH-Fb for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkOIH-0003ca-T6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:20:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49867 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkOIH-0003cH-I8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:20:29 -0400 Original-Received: from simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net ([206.47.199.163]:57254) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkOIG-0004P4-LP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:20:29 -0400 Original-Received: from simip11-ac.srvr.bell.ca ([206.47.199.91]) by simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20080929192025.OPDL1673.simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@simip11-ac.srvr.bell.ca> for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:20:25 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYEAATE4EiOsX8+/2dsb2JhbACBYrUChUqBZ4Mi Original-Received: from hlfxns0149w-142177127062.ns.aliant.net (HELO blackbart.sedgenet) ([142.177.127.62]) by alconsout.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2008 15:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from tyler by blackbart.sedgenet with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KkOIV-00065H-HC; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:20:43 -0300 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM under Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:58210 Archived-At: Allan Gottlieb writes: > At Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:42:44 -0300 tyler wrote: > > > David Kastrup writes: > >> > >> C-c C-r works in gnus. Which does not mean that alternative ways are a > >> bad idea. > > > > That combination is not defined for me in gnus, but it did lead me to > > discover toggle-rot13-mode, which I *will* now bind to C-c C-r. Thanks! > > What version of emacs are you using? > What happens if you are in a gnus summary buffer and type > > C-h k C-c C-r > My bad. I tried C-c C-r in the article buffer, not the summary buffer. It does behave as advertised when invoked from the summary buffer. Incidentally, when I first tried to decode the message, I started with C-h a rot13, which brought up a number of appropriate functions, but _not_ gnus-summary-caesar-message, which is what C-c C-r is bound to. Is there a better way to perform a quick search for functions, something more inclusive than C-h a, but faster than C-h i followed by browsing to the emacs indices? Cheers, Tyler -- Don't learn the tricks of the trade; learn the trade.