Re: Org-mode 4.39

["Carsten Dominik" <dominik@science.uva.nl>]

> for html export from latex, I recommend tex4ht -- exporting
> images is a bad thing since someone who cannot see wont be able
> to read something that should be perfectly readable.

To be honest, I did not know about tex4ht and similar programs
before your mail, so that is the main reason why there is no
option to choose it.

Looking at a few examples on the web, I must say that
with all respect for the people who implemented such a
difficult conversion, the results look really terrible
for my taste, even much worse than the equation editor
that comes with Microsoft office.  So I am definitely
going to keep the image option (also because I need
the images anyway for the preview).

However, the tex4ht output is definitely much better than
plain text representations, and yes, you can have them
read to you by a program.

I will make this configurable and allow something like
tex4ht.  Thanks for pointing me to it.

- Carsten


>
> --
> Best Regards,
> --raman
>
>
> Email:  raman@users.sf.net
> WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
> AIM:    emacspeak       GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
> PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
> Google: tv+raman
> IRC:    irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>