From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proced.el -- operate on processes like dired Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:17:23 +0100 Message-ID: <18414.49139.56167.451502@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <18409.33604.699654.7860@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <7dbe73ed0803251809u71557525w7d8253bf5d787c7d@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206829084 6150 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2008 22:18:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Mathias Dahl" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 29 23:18:35 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JfjNa-0000qK-9k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:18:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JfjMy-00048T-CV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:17:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JfjMf-0003jd-G5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JfjMe-0003iR-Iu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JfjMe-0003i5-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: from tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.164.197]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JfjMe-0003rB-3L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:17:28 -0400 Original-Received: from tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de (tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.164.207]) by tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8E184E65; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:17:24 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <7dbe73ed0803251809u71557525w7d8253bf5d787c7d@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.9 under Emacs 22.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93842 Archived-At: On Wed Mar 26 2008 Mathias Dahl wrote: > The same commands as in Dired can be used. `% m' to mark lines > where COMMAND matches a certain regexp, for example, `t' to toggle > marks, `k' to kill (remove visibly) lines. I am sorry for my ignorance...In what context is killing a useful operation in a dired buffer? I revert my dired buffers pretty often and this recovers any killed lines. If there is a command proced-do-kill-lines analogous to dired-do-kill-lines, it might be confusing that "killing" is usually a very different and permanent operation in the context of unix processes. (Right now k is bound to proced-send-signal. Certainly I could change that. But what is the most intuitive / the least counterintuitive key binding?) Thanks, Roland