From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:01:48 +1300 Message-ID: <18356.54892.186541.669277@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <87ve4sqsqe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203033736 12487 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2008 00:02:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 01:02:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPo2G-0003O2-DJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:02:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo1m-0006oH-Au for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo1h-0006o4-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo1g-0006ns-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:02:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo1g-0006np-9v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPo1c-00074S-31; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (121.31.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.31.121]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B373DAE00; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:01:53 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E52598FC6D; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:01:48 +1300 (NZDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.90.2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89112 Archived-At: > > Maybe most users are using the python-mode.el that is not included in > > Emacs. It seems to have more features than the default python.el. This appears to be just speculation. > > Have we looked at installing python-mode.el in Emacs? > > If so, what conclusion did we reach? > > Not in the last 2 years. Assuming we're talking about python-mode.el as used by XEmacs, I don't know how you reached this conclusion as we tried to get signatures for pdbtrack under 18 months ago: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2006-09/msg01082.html > > > > If not, let's look at it now (not for 22.2). > > Apart from Ken Manheimer, I have the impression that the developers of python-mode.el have a preference towards XEmacs and aren't interested in assigning copyright to FSF. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob