Re: Tabbed buffers

["T. V. Raman" <raman@users.sf.net>]

1+ on that. Also with multitty now integrated, it's nice to be
able to open a frame on a tty that is talking to an emacs running
under X or more importantly the other way around, i.e. run emacs
under screen on a tty and then use emacsclient from X to open a frame.

>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
    >> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan
    >> 2008 19:45:31 -0500 Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz,
    >> emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org
    >> 
    >> The main reason we have frames on ttys is to reduce the
    >> difference between handling of ttys and handling of
    >> graphics displays.  People normally don't use multiple
    >> frames on ttys, and that is ok, people can continue not to
    >> use them.
    Eli> 
    Eli> FWIW, I do use them on a tty, for several reasons.  One
    Eli> is to organize my work: one frame for editing code,
    Eli> another for Info, etc.  Another reason for several
    Eli> frames is when I read mail: one frame is used for Rmail
    Eli> buffer, another for the *mail* buffer where I reply.
    Eli> 
    >> But getting rid of them would just mean trouble.
    Eli> 
    Eli> I would certainly object.
    Eli> 
    Eli> 
    Eli> _______________________________________________
    Eli> Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org
    Eli> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

      
Email:  raman@users.sf.net
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM:    emacspeak       GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman 
IRC:    irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs