From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mark Bestley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61188: 30.0.50; color-lighten-name seems not to work Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:11:13 +0000 Message-ID: <180e1ab1-287c-451b-bd43-6b858638df2f@app.fastmail.com> References: <03DC6549-C68D-449B-92F8-BA3E9EB5AC5B@fastmail.co.uk> <87wn53iq99.fsf@rub.de> <83o7qe1rbi.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilgmmoj3.fsf@rub.de> <83wn51zfkh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-107-g82c3c54364-fm-20230131.002-g82c3c543 Cc: 61188@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" , "Stephen Berman" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 15:12:12 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDqN-0003vn-4W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 15:12:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDqF-0003cJ-KU; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:12:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDqE-0003cA-Qt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDqE-0007Mc-IY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDqE-0007LF-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Mark Bestley" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61188 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61188-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61188.167526070128191 (code B ref 61188); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61188) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2023 14:11:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDps-0007Kc-TZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:11:41 -0500 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:34305) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNDpq-0007KM-SL for 61188@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF07E5C0089; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 09:11:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Feb 2023 09:11:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bestley.co.uk; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1675260693; x=1675347093; bh=AQ n0CHsqQY3reni8PTsnzTi5B3FKnfEtzDWatMPEKdo=; b=eQTZyq60GyjYwXBB+y 0ZCKW/Dztv+btsyiCN4jBfwJheO/JGV7/6FwEO4VbwxvZp+s59wHqTGrHB+iAmQV iD9RDZWfHd87ZKY54UDAPoozL/Pz3T2o0zwaoP7dkYjbb64JxWcaLU6Nu6wlo+ec cXgsJCEx8geiQ6m1xkTe5Zjce+JT1uvHPyyFojZChBbHK57oJE6ImXcmDL37nFGm sQaTtmepe9u+30U17qOUx3KKt/G+iHBz3teRjstRVEs/6MLhkQk0R1/r9a4sPrmd o4Q30ZIAVm2/PzfyNeUFo85zHK3qDFNEOrm+D5IVl5fUg9Kd6bPuog6J3X9Ky8Tb WubQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1675260693; x=1675347093; bh=AQn0CHsqQY3reni8PTsnzTi5B3FK nfEtzDWatMPEKdo=; b=Bgb4MxKKlcUo4gxpAzScFdCr8Vpq3BGYjWaQP2Cs8PkZ riEZSEiohE/Wwv1WMtX++brUtTrHdfLXJJTELoAPFZi6k5yDTlBgJOfmG9KLJog+ Dj5F5NQpuJ8SmflbCVo4/M3W6JaLBIChpluXHQNs//5nufCBwOuKgRDPrAgZMMKo uNJNxhwh8Y7sOXA8IR7U5KT+GZ4CDTkqj8DUujdZLFl/wUWO2HI1NNbLiiNMY/UN K+OdKPrTUAL+8rB5dn/01PxohqXiSEjxzntUpKPDbvS2T13E3VnOxScoxuj7d9eu Dxgb0Tkhb08v6U9mD0WTnbx/4udRo3A74D6gQ5QXMg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudefiedgiedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvfevufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhkuceuvghsthhlvgihfdcuoehgnhhusegsvghsthhlvgihrdgtohdruhhkqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpefgleetvdefleehvddvheefkeefgfeiffeludefheeufedvffethfei leejhfduvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehgnhhusegsvghsthhlvgihrdgtohdruhhk X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i4629427b:Fastmail Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6B2EF2D40074; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 09:11:33 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface In-Reply-To: <83wn51zfkh.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254581 Archived-At: On Wed, 1 Feb 2023, at 13:21, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman >> Cc: gnu@bestley.co.uk, 61188@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 21:34:24 +0100 >> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 20:39:45 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > If all the tests in color-tests.el pass after the change, please >> > install on the release branch. >> >> With that patch one test now fails: the one testing (color-lighten-name >> "Black" 100). This is because the tests were changed to conform to the >> code change made in response to bug#54514. So it seems there is >> disagreement about what the result of (color-lighten-name "Black" 100) >> should be. > > So I guess the current behavior is the intended one, and we should > close this bug as wontfix? No - I think the way 28.2 worked was correct. (for impact see highlight-indent.el which now does not work with a black background ) What is the expected value of (color-lighten-name "Black" 100) as I don't know where that test is. I would think the test is wrong. Did it run for 28.2? Surely lightening Black fully should give white Also look at color-lighten-name "Black" 50) in 28.2 it is a gray. In 30 olor-lighten-name "Black" of any positive value gives Black - surely this cannot be correct. -- Mark