From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after Show/Hide Speedbar in Emacs 22.1 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:30:16 +1200 Message-ID: <18047.42824.45508.821945@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <18047.40377.211681.283040@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182771037 22647 80.91.229.12 (25 Jun 2007 11:30:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 25 13:30:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I2mm5-0002pd-Su for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:30:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2mm5-0005mf-3e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:30:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2mm0-0005jD-Mk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2mlz-0005ib-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:30:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2mly-0005iW-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I2mly-0006y5-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (244.62.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.62.244]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CC83D964A; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:30:19 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E592A8FBF6; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:30:16 +1200 (NZST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.50.5 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73806 Archived-At: > > > Can the latest speedbar from cedet be installed in trunk? > > > > It will surely break changes that I have made for using with GDB. > > That means when users install cedet they break GDB unconsciously. That might be true, I don't know how Cedet works. With the best will in the world it's not possible to test the consequences for all the external packages. I find it hard enough trying to make sure I haven't broken things _within_ Emacs! > > What benefits does it bring? > > Some bug fixes I guess. Doesn't sound very compelling. Trying to be more positive, I think it would be a good idea to move the watch expressions for GDB out of the speedbar and use tree-widget anyway (I'm hoping some-one else might do that - dreaming, I know). Also if ECB/Cedet gets integrated into Emacs then, of course, we'll have to ensure it all works together. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob