From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:12:16 +1200 Message-ID: <18038.62768.804837.608031@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <6sps3z32ap.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tztbcue9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87lkemmrg4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <18033.64249.816850.550250@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85ejkcq32v.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85k5u4nlrh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85ir9lkfhk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <18038.8116.557082.213153@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182201165 3286 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2007 21:12:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 23:12:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I0OWg-0003DC-KI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:12:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OWf-0005Pg-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OWc-0005Pb-9c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:12:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OWY-0005PB-8W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0OWY-0005P7-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I0OWU-0006go-Ot; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:12:31 -0400 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (211.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.211]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231713D9F82; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:12:24 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ABECA8FBF6; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:12:17 +1200 (NZST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.50.3 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73248 Archived-At: > > However, it might be a problem if the changes on the branch break > > things. > > If they break the Unicode branch, they will break the trunk when the > Unicode branch is merged into it. So I see no disadvantage here. There would be no record of when things broke or a way of continuing with Unicode only changes, if desired. Anyway, while I think finding compromise would be nice, I don't think Richard believes in it. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob