From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Mendler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60021: 29.0.60; Eshell completion errors in the presence of buffer redirects Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 23:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <17d95c0d-e0c5-b99d-c831-d9b815cbb25d@daniel-mendler.de> References: <87pmconwnw.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arstoffel@gmail.com, 60021@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 12 23:52:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4rex-0000AK-N6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 23:52:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4reg-0002Tr-4B; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4reV-0002SQ-97 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4reV-0003wB-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:52:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4reU-0005Nf-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Mendler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 22:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60021 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60021-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60021.167088551220667 (code B ref 60021); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 22:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60021) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2022 22:51:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55960 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4reK-0005NH-Gi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:51:52 -0500 Original-Received: from server.qxqx.de ([178.63.65.180]:58727 helo=mail.qxqx.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4reI-0005N9-B5 for 60021@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 17:51:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxqx.de; s=mail1392553390; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6tKvoXR2Q1ss4BI35J1F+R9meqsWA0WnbYY81WPzluo=; b=P5KVm2++xSSYpQwNPJ8BRRmnQW t0lJBz3TgRbsNpy5t7eufTjHhOYT9o5mPQLFzKw51o1GA4pOKzDxZt5BUDbKQs7ZfnWT7TL/QdZgQ tWs2MqU+OOUx3G2Nz+rZTPCp1UgVEMAlCdIfvCKe5P2MTCc0psepAYRGfDjr/ODGHXJM=; Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250770 Archived-At: On 12/12/22 23:24, Gregory Heytings wrote: > Thanks for your bug report. Can you check that the attached patch fixes > that bug, without introducing other obvious regressions? Yes, in my quick tests it fixes both issues. But I am not familiar with the code in question. Hard to tell if it introduces other regressions. Maybe Augusto (cc'ed) could also take a look please? Daniel