From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ian Zimmerman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: lazy-lock vs. jit-lock Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:54:32 -0500 Message-ID: <17af13780512290754i72c85f9y2b19e928daffde0a@mail.gmail.com> References: <1135869385.901568.41440@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135873618 25599 80.91.229.2 (29 Dec 2005 16:26:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 29 17:26:52 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Es0c0-0004uv-B3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:26:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Es0dM-000521-IY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Es08K-00044j-0g for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Es08G-00043z-Ih for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Es08E-00043s-Vt for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.194] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Es08b-0007EY-RX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:56:22 -0500 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y38so641773nfb for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:54:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kLr1ambhTcwNPEkK2C3by/20W/rDmOvf6hh5kNZdnGOkZTKygrIEN+7gnvXonIpU8L4u67sY+fanV9hBS7/iZqBM6XD4tzHmDZSuWvI+X8Y7iQGLQ2l24V3Fud4otThZYAUePuc2ME2OFM4WbAeVcM/HAZSC9BobjsBnqOAIE/c= Original-Received: by 10.48.12.14 with SMTP id 14mr381827nfl; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:54:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.48.243.16 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:54:32 -0800 (PST) Original-To: shreevatsa In-Reply-To: <1135869385.901568.41440@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:32283 Archived-At: On 29 Dec 2005 07:16:25 -0800, shreevatsa wro= te: > You can get rid of the delay by setting jit-lock-stealth-time to 0, > which is what I do. > Looking around on the net seems to suggest that it is lazy-lock that is > obsolete, not jit-lock. You misunderstand. It's not a delay; the chunks _never_ get fontified, exc= ept manually with M-g M-g. -- "Political systems do not deal easily with long term threats, even if they have a probability of 100%" James Schlesinger, a former director of the CIA