From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs manual mentioning thumbs mode but not tumme Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:59:01 +1200 Message-ID: <17950.43941.498605.877229@farnswood.snap.net.nz> References: <87slb8szz9.fsf@debby.local.net> <17947.65334.841905.101671@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <17949.22877.645175.478069@farnswood.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176415312 22610 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2007 22:01:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 00:01:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hc7MP-0006AC-Re for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:01:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hc7Qc-0002zI-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hc7QY-0002vJ-H9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hc7QW-0002sW-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hc7QV-0002sT-TH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hc7MH-0005o8-NF; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (245.63.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.63.245]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463FD3D85A7; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:01:33 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3C9D1627ED; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:59:02 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.97.3 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69352 Archived-At: > Yes, that's a good way to ensure no-one finds out about it. If you > consider a five line description of a package excessive, you might as > well remove it, which is a shame as it's never been included in a > release. > > Maybe we should remove it, since Tumme seems to be a superior > tool for the same job. I don't think it does do the same job, but then I don't use either. It would be nice if someone who does use both could confirm if this was true or not before talking about removing it. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob