From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniele Nicolodi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Easy way to make Emacs look more "modern" Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 23:54:09 +0200 Message-ID: <178b9fb6-0f1d-3f61-9397-1c376255db62@grinta.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 09 23:54:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJ2i-00049P-Qk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 23:54:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32962 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJ2h-0005JR-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 17:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJ24-0004co-Cu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 17:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:35168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndJ22-0005zC-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 17:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.220] (p4fe7177f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.231.23.127]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C213DEC05F for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 21:54:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=grinta.net; s=2020; t=1649541249; bh=R9U8zGuxCg9+suJoatpYz3qNsri0pptEs242Bbzp6c4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=NKdc6Qc5pqBrtglG4EBS9Dxd3zgMKC9GLX/n0j+Ac3F369+/KJlsYCeXKu6riDLZz Nktc4dKI1YoBbcTMWXYa0rOHIwHUia9qCgGMHQ0Er1H6iX15qhCcDd1/SrTugALPbn A+gkmVWXoL2VCuSSA+2SjmP78sz27SgvLKgwnCl9+/hevHHE8/ZuAW5X4qE9hycgVA b6ix3ljEHLrhJzd/2WQLpz7rAvObT/lIs4GeeQfi24WqccZQfhs/OzTal4Gtv+i8tL l0XicoQv6EQj8Lv0yAATcns+JisAgKJLwdUeYAx38PSnbZT1yWpVBVQUooDPuSOVJR f/jo4iVisB9RQ== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=109.74.203.128; envelope-from=daniele@grinta.net; helo=grinta.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288066 Archived-At: On 09/04/2022 23:43, Drew Adams wrote: > That's a pretty minor change in appearance. > > It's fine with me either way. (I don't see > a real need to adopt it as the default.) > > There's less contrast in the backgrounds of > active and inactive than what we've had - > so it's harder to see which is active. How do you define contrast? I am proposing to change only the box color: the active box color to a lighter shade and the inactive one to a lighter shade. I think the contrast overall is unchanged. But I admit that I haven't mathematically computer it. Cheers, Dan