From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se: compilation-previous-error fails if first error is at start of buffer] Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:27:49 +1300 Message-ID: <17826.61333.864425.187652@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <45A1F9F1.4050500@swipnet.se> <17826.570.959259.398020@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168306104 13108 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2007 01:28:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 01:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 02:28:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H45mn-0007cL-Aw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:28:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H45mm-0008IC-NU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H45mZ-0008Hw-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H45mY-0008HH-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H45mX-0008HE-VC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H45mR-0006Wi-Dx; Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-120-214.snap.net.nz [202.124.120.214]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABED3D8231; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:27:53 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6362B4F6E2; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:27:51 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65034 Archived-At: > Perhaps this is for his patched version. Anyway there's not much point > fixing it when, like the heads of the Lernaean Hydra, two new bugs will > take it's place in FOR-RELEASE. > > If you don't fix bugs, you will have to wait for me to have time to > fix them. I stopped waiting long ago. If the bugs are filed as proper bug reports, in a proper bug database, then I think you are more likely to find someone who is willing/able to fix them. This bug evidently never occurs in a normal compilation buffer, so it is a marginal one at best. I can't see how anyone benefits from holding back the release for such bugs, except, perhaps, the vendors of proprietary software. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob