From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:03:37 +1300 Message-ID: <17760.11257.78362.216206@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <87slggjtbb.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <455F9024.8080000@student.lu.se> <17759.43936.82301.353794@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85irhbg6zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163930901 23681 80.91.229.2 (19 Nov 2006 10:08:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 19 11:08:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gljax-0007Aw-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:08:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gljaw-0002Z4-3Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gljae-0002Xo-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:07:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gljac-0002VE-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:07:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gljab-0002Uo-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GljaY-0006C8-9M; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 05:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-125-182.snap.net.nz [202.124.125.182]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDA43D86A2; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:08:11 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id AFF15BE447; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 23:03:38 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85irhbg6zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.90.14 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62458 Archived-At: > > > We are currently working with emacsclient. It would be very good if our > > > changes in emacsclient were included in the pretest. We need a little > > > bit more time for resolving some issues and for testing. > > > > It sounds like it's too late. If the issues can't be resolved > > quickly perhaps the changes should be reverted. > > What sense is in reverting changes if it is too late? Too late to include changes in a pretest that is already out! The changes were made after the first pretest for a bug that was deemed non-critical by Richard. It seems a bit rich to ask for more time a month later. If it's quicker to revert them than to resolve then that seems to make sense to me. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob