From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "T. V. Raman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Use tls.el instead of ssl.el for HTTPS? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:13:53 -0700 Message-ID: <17721.977.758255.868271@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <874pu6c4pi.fsf@freemail.hu> Reply-To: raman@users.sf.net NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161377701 27267 80.91.229.2 (20 Oct 2006 20:55:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:55:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 20 22:55:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb1OL-0004uD-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:54:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb1OL-0005uX-1m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:54:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GaxwU-0002V6-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:13:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GaxwR-0002Qf-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GaxwR-0002QC-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [204.127.192.85] (helo=rwcrmhc15.comcast.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GaxwR-00041g-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (c-71-202-191-236.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[71.202.191.236]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc15) with ESMTP id <20061020171354m15009df19e>; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:13:54 +0000 Original-Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C702F12A4002; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: mange@freemail.hu In-Reply-To: <874pu6c4pi.fsf@freemail.hu> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.3 x-attribution: tvr X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60960 Archived-At: I believe this is legacy and dates back to the time before tls.el even existed. I think we should have w3 use tls.el consistently. >>>>> "Magnus" == Magnus Henoch writes: Magnus> The HTTPS code in url-http.el currently looks like Magnus> this: (let ((url-gateway-method (condition-case () Magnus> (require 'ssl) (error 'tls)))) ... ) Magnus> Magnus> That is, it uses ssl.el if it is available, and Magnus> otherwise uses tls.el (which is the only one included Magnus> with Emacs). Is there any reason to not always use Magnus> tls.el? Magnus> Magnus> Magnus Magnus> Magnus> Magnus> Magnus> _______________________________________________ Magnus> Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org Magnus> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel -- Best Regards, --raman Email: raman@users.sf.net WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ AIM: emacspeak GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc Google: tv+raman IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs