From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Completion in GUD buffer Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:55:23 +1200 Message-ID: <17447.43131.790481.884859@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <17447.7497.809146.303654@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <873bh4lgme.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17447.27596.415016.280125@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87r74ojxr1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <17447.31441.842894.371598@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87lkuwjv0x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143449878 32463 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2006 08:57:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 27 10:57:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNnXu-0004d9-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:57:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNnXu-0006XC-3N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:57:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNnXD-0006VB-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:57:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FNnX9-0006TZ-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:57:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNnX9-0006TJ-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FNnYb-0001Ox-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-115-219.snap.net.nz [202.124.115.219]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B0074EA16; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:57:02 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2353C88FB; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:55:25 +1200 (NZST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <87lkuwjv0x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52087 Archived-At: > > At first glance comint-dynamic-simple-complete is a candidate (just because > > its got the word complete in it). If I evaluate comint.el.~1.294~ and > > comint-update-fence from current comint.el and run current M-x gdb I see > > current behaviour. If I evaluate comint.el.~1.293~ and comint-update-fence > > from current comint.el and run current M-x gdb I see the old behaviour. > > I think I'm looking at the right ChangeLog entry. I'll explore further. > > Sorry, I meant to say that the log entry doesn't indicate that the change in > behavior was intended. Which is why fixing the bug will probably answer the > question as well. I think I've found bug now, which was actually introduced in version 1.292. I didn't mean to finger point, its just that sometimes posting the change generates some insight (I'm not familiar with this file). However it would help if I pointed to the right change. Sorry about that but it should work now, at least. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob