From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-warning-face Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:01:03 +1300 Message-ID: <17404.53519.66344.943873@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <17397.46490.581295.954155@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17402.61774.37409.530598@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140747115 24645 80.91.229.2 (24 Feb 2006 02:11:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 24 03:11:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FCSQw-00027s-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:11:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FCSQv-0006Ew-MR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:11:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FC7Z4-0004ac-Fg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:54:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FC2df-0008KY-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FC1Aj-0005Qh-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FC1Ea-0001tJ-2Z; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:09:16 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-115-39.snap.net.nz [202.124.115.39]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5693B746AB4; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:02:15 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id CB22E889F; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:01:03 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50893 Archived-At: > So how about a name like "emphasis" instead of warning? > > Or alternatively, add _both_ "emphasis" and "warning", and by default > have warning inherit from emphasis (the idea being that users could make > "warning" more obnoxious if they wanted to, while "emphasis" would > continue to be more acceptable for normal usage). I was trying to keep things simple. I think there should be at least one face described in the node "Standard Faces" that complements shadow, and that font-lock-warning-face seems to be currently serving that purpose. If people want others, that's fine with me (for example the face dired-warning inherits from font-lock-comment-face for more subdued warning (= emphasis?)). -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob