From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6eeab90632: Don't accept whitespace or hex floats in rgbi: colour specs Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:31:35 +0100 Message-ID: <17382C6A-7253-40DF-BF3D-DE4090FAA07E@acm.org> References: <164657208058.1597.5057681041192670917@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220306130800.EE0F9C01681@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a6e3p51f.fsf@yahoo.com> <77E09460-1313-41CC-B52A-B586A1D2671F@acm.org> <87wnh6ob10.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39538"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 07 10:34:45 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nR9lL-0009vm-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 10:34:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nR9lJ-0005EB-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 04:34:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nR9id-0003hk-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 04:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1446c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.46]:59664 helo=mail265c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nR9iT-0006Tm-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 04:31:55 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1646645499; bh=ASmhdz8pLeLdjguMHEH8/fsSo+nGpJrTjZfWExG1Qrg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=MweZFe5uOt4YtuysjO/vK8ZtfcBswG1b3ynsMlptQ7orr+4cNaIYR5gdZ7RZKoRwc jdl7Jn7toZ0E8IiRk/3GyFNNQ2DFAFkCB7HwZKmrIolr1PVo1nsmQWIQvtRkVMMqoI sg17lSE+6UxGde88ZX/dGGNiV66Wajo6Y4L44/hw= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-b952e353.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [83.227.82.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail265c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 2279VZxT004449; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 09:31:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87wnh6ob10.fsf@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F22.6225D0FA.007C, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.46; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail265c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286881 Archived-At: 7 mars 2022 kl. 01.34 skrev Po Lu : > AFAICT, there are no other implementations of such an rgbi color > specification (please correct me if I'm wrong.) The syntax is from X11, or at least that is why Emacs supports it. > I don't think there's a chance that the user will type any of those by > mistake. Besides, the documentation can always be amended, and that > function has no other specification. So I disagree that it doesn't do > the user a service. These unintended extensions do not provide the user with any additional = expressive power so there seems to be little reason for them. For that = matter, I believe that extensions should be motivated by needs, not by = implementation happenstance. Don't you agree? In any case we are debating angels dancing on a pinhead. I just fixed it = because I made the mistake to begin with, and I don't think you should = elevate my errors to holy scripture quite yet (please wait until I'm = dead).