Re: Re: Org-mode 4.69

[Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>]

On Mar 22, 2007, at 17:45, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:

> Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
>> On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what would be better.  But this reminds me that we
>>> need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and
>>> org-shiftcontrolleft.
>>
>> Arrrrgh.  Yes.  Proposals?????
>
> Well, the relatively difficult key combination C-c C-x <right> is
> bound to the relatively common org-shiftright, whereas C-c <right> is
> unbound.  Would it make sense to move org-shiftright to C-c <right>
> and org-shiftcontrolright to C-c C-x <right> (and similar for the
> other things on S-<directions>)?  Would make editing timestamps
> marginally less painful on a tty, as well.  Unless these are being
> reserved for some reason?

I don't think so, and I like the proposal.  Thanks.

- Carsten

>
> -- 
> +-----------------------------------------------------------+
> | Jason F. McBrayer                    jmcbray@carcosa.net  |
> | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in |
> | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one |
> | is the greatest of all conquerors.  --- The Dhammapada    |
>
>

--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477