emacs 24.5 is downloaded from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ , I don't know whether it is enable -02,


May be my machine is too slow, Thinkpad s3-s440

1. i5-4210U  http://ark.intel.com/products/81016/Intel-Core-i5-4210U-Processor-3M-Cache-up-to-2_70-GHz
2. 4G RAM
 







At 2016-06-15 04:39:34, "Fabrice Popineau" <fabrice.popineau@gmail.com> wrote:
>Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> 
>> > From: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau <at> gmail.com>
>> > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
>> > 
>> > > download pyim-bigdict-cf210fa066f2fa18c1606eeddfffcf84.el from  
>> > https://github.com/tumashu/tumashu-temp-filesand eval: 
>> > > 
>> > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE        (setq pyim-dict-cache              (with-temp-
>> > buffer                (insert-file-contents "/path/to/pyim-bigdict-
>> > cf210fa066f2fa18c1606eeddfffcf84.el")                (eval (read (current-
>> > buffer)))))#+END_EXAMPLE
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > So, starting from `emacs -Q' on an i7-4702HQ with emacs-25.0.94, windows 10, 
>I 
>> > get a user time of about 4s and the following profiler report:
>> 
>> On an i7 system I get 0.6s with Emacs 25.0.95 and 2s with 24.5.  Both
>> are optimized (-O2) builds.  This is comparable with the GNU/Linux
>> results, and is what I'd expect.  Unless yours are not -O2, I don't
>> understand how you get so much slower times.
>
>I was running in economy mode power plan :-)
>
>$ time ../../build-emacs-25/src/emacs -Q -batch -l test.el
>
>real    0m0.737s
>user    0m0.000s
>sys     0m0.015s
>
>So yes, he must be using an unoptimized build.
>
>Fabrice