From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Kalman Reti" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: mark_object crash in 22.1 and latest CVS (as of tonight) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:48:40 -0500 Message-ID: <16af2f430711161248o431ff3b8hdd7f6abb835e3d67@mail.gmail.com> References: <16af2f430711081955j3d5e6745gc0f7a50e02d9a892@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711090332x39c8c768gb01d1dc6a0e4f427@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711120340q27926877tf976ef397d12df16@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711140939x45663644je0dce25c8796b18@mail.gmail.com> <16af2f430711150038u692d7c5cw27666e11271d7f83@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195246144 2265 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2007 20:49:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, kalman.reti@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 16 21:49:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1It87c-0003kf-0g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:49:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1It87O-0003MQ-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:48:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1It87L-0003Ki-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:48:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1It87G-0003Er-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:48:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1It87F-0003Eo-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.235]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1It87F-0004Vj-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f1so939524nzc for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:48:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ALzE/V7W2KcD4Uv4/LiHmWmiTjWI7N4HjTSp2yVDxww=; b=bjzq7gVlcbJn7f0PnisUCd5HnLH8EjQcPDxcaj46ZN1jw2CEkVK0Zk80I8ctaXvO5TeLMnFvAQ6DYjHAroQWXUZRtLLxf4ZyO1SbOFxL8LWKr7FGNxcMlnQQc1bxhvBf6NqD/zkjiNytU3yDi3UrzaMv39ZXSx9xn53K+bzq9rw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V8xlGkrYCtn+iIoIPwjfvYcgcRbJTnziGM+YMdubUx0vOiK1BHgsDvHH8lw6A58nhhLXyLXdlXrw/qsbu1+DvMcg+tNxhXH9xnmdEIn1DePR2ZMafUSc5+VJlduYPA2+DGTszDGYAuaX7IceUkInxMeqFWv1UuL4aS4N7G2/bHM= Original-Received: by 10.142.103.6 with SMTP id a6mr761262wfc.1195246120210; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:48:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.143.167.19 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:48:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <16af2f430711150038u692d7c5cw27666e11271d7f83@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83372 gmane.emacs.bugs:16993 Archived-At: On Nov 15, 2007 3:38 AM, Kalman Reti wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 10:08 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > > > > Definitely not. It needs to be AFTER `name' so that it will be marked > > by GC. I've performed the experiment of building code straight from CVS and putting a breakpoint in the special code for handling un-gc-marked-markers. In my (long running previously resulting in a crash) test case, this breakpoint NEVER is reached. When I move the undo_list to before name and redo the experiment, I hit the breakpoint many many times. So either the special undo_list handling code should be removed or the undo_list moved before name in buffer.h.