From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10726: 24.0.93; `find-file-noselect': why should it interrogate the user? Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 07:39:46 -0800 Message-ID: <16D3AD92400E430D8C4FE9B19FC6DAAA@us.oracle.com> References: <012A5E800AD44CC090696172BAD6F5A3@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328542892 16911 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 15:41:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10726@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 16:41:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQh1-0003UO-0B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:41:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49748 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQh0-0000oj-67 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQgt-0000o8-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQgp-00023H-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQgp-000236-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQhd-0007c8-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10726 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10726-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10726.132854286129183 (code B ref 10726); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10726) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2012 15:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQgf-0007aX-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:17714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQga-0007aG-SV for 10726@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:40:57 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id q16Fdxw7027012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:39:59 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q16FdwJi006815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:39:58 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt111.oracle.com (abhmt111.oracle.com [141.146.116.63]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q16FdvvR006034; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:39:58 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.42.177) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:39:57 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Thread-Index: Aczk2Sn3yadVinVDR8ygN9yrBkpe8wADBjAA X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090202.4F2FF44F.010C,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56567 Archived-At: > > I do see that `find-file-noselect' has been posing > > questions to the user since Day One. But I do not > see why that is appropriate. > > FWIW, I largely agree on the principle. But I think that requires > non-trivial changes, including maybe adding a new "really > non-interactive" version of find-file-noselect. Yes. That's the point of the bug report. It would mean factoring out the truly non-interactive part as the real `find-file-noselect' and using the interrogation part as a wrapper that is called by commands when used interactively.