From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: covici@ccs.covici.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23 Mac port Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:52:51 -0500 Message-ID: <16832.1289785971@ccs.covici.com> References: <2282B3B4-D844-4E26-BB94-9F79EEA2E847@gmail.com> <4CE058E8.9010606@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289786004 640 80.91.229.12 (15 Nov 2010 01:53:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 01:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 15 02:53:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHoFu-0001Cd-QJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:53:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49830 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHoFt-0008RT-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49232 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHoFj-0008PX-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHoFf-0004bn-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from wlym.com ([66.135.63.43]:52568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHoFf-0004bh-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ccs.covici.com (pool-71-171-100-42.clppva.fios.verizon.net [71.171.100.42]) (authenticated bits=128) by wlym.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id oAF1qsfG012175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:52:56 -0600 Original-Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAF1qpqs016834; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:52:54 -0500 In-reply-to: Comments: In-reply-to Leo message dated "Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:48:12 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.2.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132623 Archived-At: Leo wrote: > On 2010-11-15 05:47 +0800, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > Thanks for continuing to do this work. I still find the AppKit port to > > be more reliable and useful than the NS one, and I hope it makes it > > into mainline one day. > > I second this. I wonder about which one is more accessible -- the macport -- so far -- is the only one where VoiceOver reads anything, but it does not read the mode line nor can I see completion buffers. So, where is this appkit port so I can test? I did try a couple of other emacs ports for mac, but none of them were accessible at all with Voiceover. Thanks for any ideas. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com