From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "fr_ml@t-online.de" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56695: AW: bug#56695: A new and old font problem with Arabic Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1658781997964.1798792.a494cda741c885f7492ec2f4a8b80c17e207eab8@spica.telekom.de> References: <1658477476172.1551810.eccda65c0f1753ea37e1355f26961ec46de3f906@spica.telekom.de> <83edydl80c.fsf@gnu.org> <1658497265479.1589294.1e7fbe71a9c257912af2f6c3a3b45532d616817d@spica.telekom.de> <83tu79jkmx.fsf@gnu.org> <1658505514827.73776.682275763c1d9abc1bd4255a438e1cc56f74d095@spica.telekom.de> <83fsitjeya.fsf@gnu.org> <1658647485367.1660023.0bfff6814be31f7bc4cfabb21b2b5c99e5f083d8@spica.telekom.de> <838roihoph.fsf@gnu.org> <1658762963915.1797956.84a8985b7fe32b4077cf35452c034178b85b515d@spica.telekom.de> <83k081dvn1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: "fr_ml@t-online.de" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35749"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "56695-done@debbugs.gnu.org" <56695-done@debbugs.gnu.org> To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 25 22:47:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yw-000961-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:47:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yv-0007cn-19 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yk-0007cQ-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yk-0002gQ-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yk-0003xr-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "fr_ml@t-online.de" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 20:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56695 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56695-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D56695.165878201115207 (code D ref 56695); Mon, 25 Jul 2022 20:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56695-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2022 20:46:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yY-0003xD-VD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:46:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout01.t-online.de ([194.25.134.80]:46128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oG4yX-0003x3-Gv for 56695-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fwd70.dcpf.telekom.de (fwd70.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.96]) by mailout01.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 47C742374; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:46:48 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from spica34.aul.t-online.de ([172.20.102.132]) by fwd70.dcpf.telekom.de with esmtp id 1oG4yM-1CnZp20; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:46:38 +0200 Original-Received: from 95.91.228.60:28738 by cmpweb09.mgt.mul.t-online.de with HTTP/1.1 (Lisa V6-13-13-0.0 on API V5-45-2-0); Mon, 25 Jul 22 22:46:37 +0200 Original-Received: from 172.20.102.133:20684 by spica34.aul.t-online.de:8080; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:46:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83k081dvn1.fsf@gnu.org> X-UMS: email X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1658781998-0144B853-7868CFC9/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: fc4afcfa-b2dd-4c47-8a5a-3a81916d9b45 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237905 Archived-At: > I'm guessing "some years ago" you used different versions of the same > fonts. A font that was OK in the past could regress later. It was, I think, when harfbuzz was introduced. > For correct complex shaping, it is very important to find good fonts. > I suggest to look for a good Arabic font that is fixed-pitch, and use > it instead of DejaVu Sans. I never had any problem with any font. "Dejavu Sans Mono" is fixed-pitch, =EF=BB=BF