From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More enhancements to fringe bitmaps. Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:59:32 +0000 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <16427.45300.93906.19878@nick.uklinux.net> References: <16426.48548.766163.869974@nick.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076609267 9719 80.91.224.253 (12 Feb 2004 18:07:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 12 19:07:37 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ArLFR-0002Bq-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:07:37 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ArLFR-00057l-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:07:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ArL88-0007Hc-9J for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ArKuI-0004En-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:45:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ArKt9-0003yY-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1ArKnt-0002Xr-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.247.48.221] (helo=nick.uklinux.net) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ArKK8-0007Ne-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: by nick.uklinux.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id 920BE75FDF; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:59:32 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.97 under Emacs 21.2.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19895 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19895 > As a side note, I also find it hard to get used to NOT being able > to set a break-point with the mouse in a source buffer which is > not "side-shifted". But you can set a breakpoint, by clicking in the fringe, using the code that you wrote (the local variable gud-minor-mode needs to be non-nil, though). > I don't see why the two approaches cannot live side by side, i.e. let > it be a user option whether the breakpoint should be in the display > margin or in the fringe (when available, and it has a width >= 8 > pixels): > > I.e. something like.. I would prefer to have just one approach. If the general preference is to use the fringe then I'll move the breakpoint icons there. > The new code I added explicitly handles the overlay arrow as an > overlay also in the fringe, i.e. the > icon is shown above another > bitmap (eg. a breakpoint icon) in the same position. This certainly makes the fringe more attractive. Nick