From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38992: 27.0.60; when enabled, fido-mode seems to break vc-git-grep Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:54:53 +0300 Message-ID: <157c6af1-c900-188d-490c-4f48ea17da3d@yandex.ru> References: <288610218.111246.1578330546916@office.mailbox.org> <7293f6ca-b11d-3d2a-ad71-831135434e75@yandex.ru> <780526337.114357.1578556168662@office.mailbox.org> <944631362.128066.1578605073103@office.mailbox.org> <98df50d8-44fb-448e-e893-f20601f1ca54@yandex.ru> <51d12435-274b-be14-95b8-f790804f1a61@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="126733"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: 38992@debbugs.gnu.org, waah@yellowfrog.io, Stefan Monnier To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 20 15:56:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1itYTR-000Wmg-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:56:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itYTQ-0008UX-Pt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:56:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1itYTG-0008UN-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:56:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itYTC-0000xX-5G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1itYTC-0000xK-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itYTB-0006p7-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38992 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38992.157953210524991 (code B ref 38992); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2020 14:55:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itYSH-0006Uz-Il for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:39805) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1itYSD-0006UJ-Be for 38992@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id y1so24286826lfb.6 for <38992@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:55:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o4l7WIvJ7AavCzSr38jsj6D+1OX7CNvv68sdY+btDhM=; b=kNoYjF6V6LguTwT1vAa6VZMTZde+sbFq3BVoLw5cCI70CS8sJ8BtPKkVqmUh1K2yiT +nUfaDm38ukLheL5E9LUDeq3dR+qj++jzjTAxO4PQswdanL3MZm2tzuKMtoflWOoN8/o 498nEnKAR5cB+wJunevkSRjng4+ZnA8/Az8uzDu9uUQojHJB4l1sitzDd9e/7Fhf8vgb D6fEDJodq9xkUdXyOtXVSL2GEP2H1FfYKWollv0DIkZ5jBkqEReZRRKaoxcLhFYV790U tBdaLcdzQQUc6G5di0H4Jbu2WZhjvHHcWdBl2+kJEYWJqCbqAWzMyFwAuzS9iyW55oQF dnCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o4l7WIvJ7AavCzSr38jsj6D+1OX7CNvv68sdY+btDhM=; b=ZjJ+UeQUDxqrsn0TBh2PQCeW5rnO7qkuGWwAiAg45lOjNVsiVT050+aUFDZVbfPqge x/2pp4O3i7m6BW2lGJL/GulL5YLNFWsuDjSRVxgexBQ9Q1/p3ZpkIz2PO0NrZRshqyvZ lx2Yqf+2tpigeQ++0RQnl2H6r2dTOj5xtGnpCwh2jwSn5C1y2s4vilC2r1qVdtRjw6V5 M9nnjoRLV2DuUC5n2SmfjNMow8ilWeZRmtW6ZMpOtR2CpjzwOYJVySurXzN2n3Oz1HxQ /Z/d3iAwd7rr0d9Wtx2mE+OA57vNMWXMAHnTFkokvKRZbNOFsKD0HqIQiTa4bQg20a9L o2Sw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXOaynRqJfnDfEUpiWmfJJz23MWbItT6r9R0Pak+XPx1bQ37Mto iD+9aW2QtpuOmSY4GCzyLmQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz7WMHiedneNyfS+fD3VkmOxpj3tsaz3ug92l4af9QnWgPu5qavxDjulgTZxVD/e0RGe3lg0Q== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5964:: with SMTP id h4mr4336055lfp.213.1579532095348; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:54:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o19sm20370191lji.54.2020.01.20.06.54.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 06:54:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:174919 Archived-At: On 19.01.2020 16:00, João Távora wrote: > The second option looks pretty good, so you can just push that at will, > if no other objections. I'm not very familiar with the code. Do we really need the minibuffer-force-complete call there? I commented it out and can't see the difference. > Incidentally, I would also think it reasonable to > provide the same help text if there is a single partial match. Makes sense, but that sounds a bit more complicated. We don't show any message in this case now, do we?