From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Roland Winkler <roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: ediff-next-difference very slow
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:14:27 +0200
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <15549.37203.921263.806460@tfkp00.physik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <15549.30433.173962.449867@tfkp00.physik.uni-erlangen.de>
	<4532-Wed17Apr2002175638+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019056684 32622 127.0.0.1 (17 Apr 2002 15:18:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:18:04 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xrC7-0008U3-00
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:18:04 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xrCG-00088X-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:18:12 -0400
Original-Received: from max5.rrze.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.3.50])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xrA0-0007vq-00
	for <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:15:52 -0400
Original-Received: from tfkp00.physik.uni-erlangen.de by max5.rrze.uni-erlangen.de with ESMTP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:14:39 +0200
Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <4532-Wed17Apr2002175638+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under Emacs 21.2.1
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:736
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:736

On Wed Apr 17 2002 Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> It seems that having many overlays in a buffer slows down Emacs quite
> a bit.  Perhaps this problem is another manifestation of that?

This is something I do not understand: Is it sufficient here for
slowing emacs down that one buffer of all the open buffers has many
overlays? Or do you refer to the buffers that are involved in the
ediff session? The point is that the buffers involved in the ediff
session are the same in a fresh emacs session and in an emacs
session that is running for many days.

Roland