From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Jostein=20Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: nxml-mode: consider changing nxml-sexp-element-flag default Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:36:31 +0100 Message-ID: <1521790591.299052.1313256576.251A2D78@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1521144097.2469677.1304661504.09A209E0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <86h8pen9st.fsf@dod.no> <1521492750.2916267.1308771384.398BDC27@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1521526729.3786392.1309201952.160A597B@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: jostein@kjonigsen.net NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_15217905912990520" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521790521 15555 195.159.176.226 (23 Mar 2018 07:35:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:35:21 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 23 08:35:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezHEG-0003sQ-3a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:35:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezHGJ-0003yl-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezHFd-0003yN-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:36:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezHFa-00057w-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:44085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezHFa-00057N-EP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:36:34 -0400 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E153120E46; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:36:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:36:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= secure.kjonigsen.net; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OUvbAis4WO1zzJEIo/L/KFAMvd96XGBoy3nNqu9iSpo=; b=fOf/r7aWjJRV J/Tzi/A9B/kWrVi95HXPvZ5P1Fcvk5XCXtv3a1Wh11a7IH+HNgPgOZRYzs3BUw1/ bnXgPAtSQGOP3Xobi/jppXJFE333dpxAaBBFGZOPtiP9E6ysx6dxZ4GwWhufcDd7 0UtP16uJtwpzR53DHEpt/5H+TlX18YH7sea6HXxfJbF9qqJBjtTO4e0GMozHWP2N sRDLC4NeYhm4Llm0x1HFjNlzadkydwZ4ZtxIJ+ZwEJ0N4+dVmlWoKCYBh64BkVa0 dRq9+9vd3qbJiR1OwqXInOH31aWmERiQGPX7sPgE0trR/jI04u8EnV4R9QJ6ghsc Hq/ySPFQWA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OUvbAis4WO1zzJEIo/L/KFAMvd96XGBoy3nNqu9iSpo=; b=kyQtxc57za4P uLaYgoya7kg6vOXBQNcT8Fgj6c3am9zhmQyLN2ymJGs+vj+JOut51As5iNG8altC Gt+j2OovI6wxzvNlcIxOOK2ES6iVBll9HUuLMOHuG4mnBDqfCJRZS2settgTGBo8 0tvjLvn9wqiue2BPXUnEqE2hZUY9CYSJ3vu10fUZk77cKEQv0Sx8qSMMM+pgwkGJ hPnEwUYWZyfkKuIZZrmPP3XV0wix8jZ84ZoOrC2Bvef5+qoD6tCq0AUWB9FlnvDV NR4jJ76PXW7tRN+BMZfDFHSTlSkr1v7EOhbMiIzbrQr3SE2qGpTbJrT8u82bT6os 6+jTT1zJHw== X-ME-Sender: Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id B99E59E08B; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:36:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-5ce6c4ba In-Reply-To: <1521526729.3786392.1309201952.160A597B@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.29 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223937 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_----------=_15217905912990520 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I realize the Emacs 26.1 RC is probably high on everyone's list right now, but are we going anywhere with this patch? If so, I'd just like to point out that I don't have commit-access to the Emacs git repo, so someone else will have to merge :) -- Regards Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen jostein@kjonigsen.net =F0=9F=8D=B5 jostein@gmail.com https://jostein.kjonigsen.net On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, at 7:18 AM, Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 10:03 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> In case there's no objections and we decide to go through with this,>>>= I've change the default and run "make check". >>> It seems no tests are impacted, and the patch is therefore pretty >>> small.>>> Is there anything more we'll need to do? >>=20 >> Mention the change in etc/NEWS ? >>=20 >>=20 >> Stefan >=20 > Sounds reasonable. Fixed. >=20 > -- > Regards > Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen >=20 > jostein@kjonigsen.net =F0=9F=8D=B5 jostein@gmail.com > https://jostein.kjonigsen.net >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Email had 1 attachment: > * nxml-mode.patch > 2k (text/plain) --_----------=_15217905912990520 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
I realize the Emacs 26.1 RC is probably high on everyone's list = right now, but are we going anywhere with this patch?

If so, I'd just like to point out that I don't have commit-access to t= he Emacs git repo, so someone else will have to merge :)

--
Regards
Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen



On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, at 7:18 AM, Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, at 10:03 PM, Stefan Mo= nnier wrote:
In case there's no objections an= d we decide to go through with this,
I've change the default and run "make check".
It seems no tests are impacted, and the patch is therefore pretty smal= l.
Is there anything more we'll need to do?

Mention the change in etc/NEWS ?


        Stefan

Sounds reasonable. Fixed.

--
Regards
Jostein Kj=C3=B8nigsen





Email had 1 attachment:

  • nxml-mode.patch=
      2k (text/plain)

--_----------=_15217905912990520--