From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39704: 28.0.50; vc-print-branch-log data loss Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 02:25:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1428b9d3-4017-491a-dccc-8db93de2373b@yandex.ru> References: <871rqoj0mk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="41284"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: Tom Tromey To: Juri Linkov , 39704@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 21 01:26:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8w-000Ab8-O9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 01:26:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50804 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8v-0004Ln-Rm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8p-0004LT-77 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:26:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8o-0006tL-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8o-0006tG-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8o-0005a6-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39704 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39704-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39704.158224473221417 (code B ref 39704); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39704) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2020 00:25:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46150 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8K-0005ZM-0v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:25:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com ([209.85.128.48]:56276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4w8H-0005Z9-FH for 39704@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 19:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id q9so411872wmj.5 for <39704@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:25:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0EYMiDS4/xPEH8wpOwOi7WyihfDHRY0isrI0qSADulY=; b=I3KJJKT6lpZHQ+gAJ0kUbrr+WB+qW+/encgKbkJYUg30wfBQBop3awqmENWscDdgNa 2OWOzbNixmo7P6rVtUqcUu6oU7ZOfgrrLduGBTqKWcGxr0PeNbaQRl1kVbqkDoiQ8etE EN5JKsMQA9eVgglsKDm3ZWnJAJ5z7ZCMkvM7FVg2zQtzHvisVuV0g1EwVHZbVE1Z14L7 sEqEj9rjAr/CMlfodWOzm0TYYt2YGy4v39nZexXlaQtPo0s17gopQYQiQKp1Y4wJgdqe ayMkqnr4EPU9oLwz3UagBzg//Jc1UuDELLU/AnFKhpXSSjcYkwmm/RpCoCXhmb9wjuNu kGUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0EYMiDS4/xPEH8wpOwOi7WyihfDHRY0isrI0qSADulY=; b=kHvEuPU/iqZS6iRLIav9/ol1hpdCXrVg5fKD+5LLCGd0B0oZWTEzaqgBvZ9/gf6FSR Ip4C+BajWWnjQaC1rI3UtUEb43uAIbvtOS48oV+Umv8H70HqX9IsLamODXYFe+jWMc/4 3YWFCjPOD4t3Qjgbdol1F0iayYoz/dYd3dh2FIPqha8H2CKKlVkJopMyoz7wFCUbycbX Lmp7yL2vyvxQ1Pa7MuoR9AMv6+Ht6YYJ+qX62XcdoNt/XmcA6+CjjeJ2jfeNZwFDJLKi LlAfol7CcWF2EIvVNUCLxwwu9uu5MqAbqS19ftmI4YZcuMZnVa/vmSO1hs1jbvJyK0KJ r44Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLto4mg1gTJabmhqLrDmitn4JXCWpMsxXugLxaNa/5eT+0sibp fy9g7fBs/H1dKhVMFu3WgwoHy0on X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxF582PDPROY/y4bFXznkAvI7DkZiy2EFWqFeSoM/VN9wcRRGQcM4zFf5yVmHXLzfdzzj/R7w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8095:: with SMTP id b143mr6935828wmd.7.1582244723530; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:25:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c9sm1316448wme.41.2020.02.20.16.25.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:25:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871rqoj0mk.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176334 Archived-At: On 21.02.2020 1:32, Juri Linkov wrote: > Tags: patch > > Accidentally I noticed that vc-print-branch-log prints a narrower log > than it should. I don't remember any damage from this data loss > but this is not the right thing to do - by default it should show logs > from the repository root, not logs limited to a subdirectory when > this command happens to be called from a subdirectory. > > Am I correct to expect that vc-print-branch-log should print > log from branch's root like vc-print-root-log does, and > not from a subdirectory like vc-print-log does? I think so (then, the patch LGTM). Tom might want to weigh in on this, though.