The following patch adds "not" to the list of CSS pseudo-classes. By the way, for the future, is it OK for me to install such trivial changes without putting them up for review first? -- Simen From dec8e9b8f3eb23698aa774c54ab9b31f9314053a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Simen=20Heggest=C3=B8yl?= Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 21:38:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] textmodes/css-mode.el: Add "not" pseudo-class * textmodes/css-mode.el (css-pseudo-class-ids): Add "not" to list of CSS pseudo-classes. --- lisp/ChangeLog | 5 +++++ lisp/textmodes/css-mode.el | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog index 94b4be7..a9f507b 100644 --- a/lisp/ChangeLog +++ b/lisp/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2015-04-06 Simen Heggestøyl + + * textmodes/css-mode.el (css-pseudo-class-ids): Add "not" to list + of CSS pseudo-classes. + 2015-04-06 Paul Eggert Spelling fix for 'hfy-optimizations' diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/css-mode.el b/lisp/textmodes/css-mode.el index 7280080..8b2ee73 100644 --- a/lisp/textmodes/css-mode.el +++ b/lisp/textmodes/css-mode.el @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ (defconst css-pseudo-class-ids '("active" "checked" "disabled" "empty" "enabled" "first" "first-child" "first-of-type" "focus" "hover" "indeterminate" "lang" - "last-child" "last-of-type" "left" "link" "nth-child" + "last-child" "last-of-type" "left" "link" "not" "nth-child" "nth-last-child" "nth-last-of-type" "nth-of-type" "only-child" "only-of-type" "right" "root" "target" "visited") "Identifiers for pseudo-classes.") -- 2.1.4