El mar, 21-01-2014 a las 23:02 -0500, emacs-devel-request@gnu.org escribió: > From: Eli Zaretskii > > From: Tom > > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC) > > > > David Engster randomsample.de> writes: > > > > > For Java? Never, unless someone seriously starts working on it. However, > > > your statement that it is futile in the first place will surely not > > > attract anybody, so please don't make such claims. > > > > My point was that much more can be gained with much less work by > > working on interface packages than natively reimplementing these > > features. > > And even more will be gained by using Visual Studio instead of Emacs, > but so what? > > Like David points out: a lot of required infrastructure already > exists, so this is doable, given enough motivation. It's not an > unthinkable effort. Well, I started to learn elisp today! :D. Ok, that may not be so useful for the size of the task, but I have to start in some place, right? -- Pax et bonum. Jorge Araya Navarro. Diseñador publicitario, programador Python/C++ y colaborador en Parabola GNU/Linux-libre.