From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jarek Czekalski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Move to git is imminent - awaiting Stefan's approval Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:06:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1389035161434-308684.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <20140106165108.B6BF4380865@snark.thyrsus.com> <87d2k59ckr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389035171 18134 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2014 19:06:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:06:11 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 20:06:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0FVA-00045m-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:06:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36889 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0FV9-0001XI-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0FV2-0001WF-Rk for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0FUx-0006JK-0t for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]:32852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0FUw-0006J6-Sn for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W0FUv-00088q-EG for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:06:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87d2k59ckr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 216.139.236.26 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167498 Archived-At: W dniu 01/06/2014 07:42 PM, Bastien pisze: > Agreed. The discussion itself has been distracting, even if useful. > Also, a more formal count would help to let those who are less vocal > express their views/vote. Sure, let's remember how this thread started. Karl Fogel wrote: > I'm mainly posting > this so there's a place for people to follow up to express their > preference, so we can quickly get a sense of whether moving to git is > the obvious call for the group as a whole, not just for those of us who > have been been expressing that preference for some time. Now Eric turns this thread into voting: > We can ask Karl Fogel for a poll count but I > think we all know how that would turn out; the pro-git vote has > been overwhelming. If the decision is to be made by a poll, I would like to know: - who votes - if not only admins, what are the final positions of the admins (each of them) Please give this info in a separate thread, that would be easy to catch. Please add a vote "both are ok for me" to the poll I would like to support admins with my vote, if it counts. Thanks, Jarek PS. I have problems posting to devel, forgive me if this arrives twice. -- View this message in context: http://emacs.1067599.n5.nabble.com/Move-to-git-is-imminent-awaiting-Stefan-s-approval-tp308660p308684.html Sent from the Emacs - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.