From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: draxil Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10688: The default mode for Perl should be cperl-mode instead of perl-mode Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1351178844503-268051.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <8762fmbmwn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <1351159277417-268030.post@n5.nabble.com> <1351178622882-268048.post@n5.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351178894 5873 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2012 15:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:28:14 +0000 (UTC) To: 10688@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 25 17:28:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPM6-0000Xt-Io for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:28:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLy-0002xX-FN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLr-0002u2-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLi-00008e-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLi-00008Z-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPNi-0007FB-2L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: draxil Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10688 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.135117898827805 (code B ref -1); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2012 15:29:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPNT-0007EP-Rn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51764) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPNR-0007EI-DI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLL-0008US-Pg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:41151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLL-0008UG-1v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLG-0002Nz-Rw for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLB-0008RB-8Z for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]:58176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLB-0008R3-3y for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRPLA-0006MB-GX for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:27:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1351178622882-268048.post@n5.nabble.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66035 Archived-At: Oh, I see that maybe you were asking more specifically about the reasons for cperl-mode being a better replacement? Last time I used perl-mode *was* a long time ago, but it had broken syntax highlighting and things like indentation couldn't take account of perl syntax very well. Perhaps I should try and look at the latest perl mode for a fair comparison, and or to remember what else I hated and whether any of it is still true. -- View this message in context: http://emacs.1067599.n5.nabble.com/bug-10688-The-default-mode-for-Perl-should-be-cperl-mode-instead-of-perl-mode-tp47588p268051.html Sent from the Emacs - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.