From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Svante Signell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Need help with upstream vs Debian emacs-23.4 build differences Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:15:23 +0200 Organization: Hemma Message-ID: <1341263723.16363.19.camel@x60> References: <1340924981.32095.176.camel@hp.my.own.domain> <1340956879.32095.215.camel@hp.my.own.domain> Reply-To: svante.signell@telia.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341263743 10214 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2012 21:15:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 02 23:15:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SlnyA-0001Qd-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:15:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slny8-00058Y-C6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slny4-00057d-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:15:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slny3-0006jB-A5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:47906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Slny0-0006hC-R7; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:15:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.1.64] (78.70.161.98) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u84406617) id 4FD624AF00765295; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:15:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 195.67.226.208 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151380 Archived-At: On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 00:30 -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > Glenn Morris wrote: > > > IIUC, Debian includes several patches to the Emacs sources. > > Come to think of it, this may explain at least some of the things you > are seeing with the loaddefs files. Patching lisp files will cause the > timestamp of the loaddefs files to be out-of-date, and require them to > be regenerated. It should work, but it's not really an expected > situation. The Debian patches does not change the files causing the problems, e.g cedets/semantic/loaddefs.el is changed, why? I don't see why the small Debian changes causes so large changes to the loaddefs.el files.