From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Merten Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: testcover: setf-method and treatment of `defcustom' Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:06:52 +0200 Message-ID: <13361.1347786412@eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org> References: <6900.1347261102@theowa.merten-home.homelinux.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347786426 30711 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2012 09:07:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jonathan Yavner To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 16 11:07:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TDAoj-0001oi-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:07:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51584 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDAof-0004c1-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 05:07:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDAod-0004af-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 05:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDAoc-0003e9-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 05:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:51190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDAoc-0003e4-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 05:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (krsn-4d0b8f34.pool.mediaWays.net [77.11.143.52]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MVFW5-1T0tHZ2wRR-00YTxD; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:06:56 +0200 Original-Received: by eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 172CDC1654; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eskebo.merten-home.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC4DC1631; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 11:06:52 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: Comments: In-reply-to Stefan Monnier message dated "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:40:11 -0400." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.1.1 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:2uxocLYsgkpU3Ab4brA/q+8VzrHZm38gsRquPtnJjW5 dM9VMh/GjV2ndltXCpngJKbIM/megFwAkUdabtqgPAwH5ZJubO MHxplMUYySUeO8AWPN+/gKM7UQi6d80vfXOKMyR5d7vyn29Q1+ JVQ3IOUc4m7YFl0MphJMrY68TZg8fnPTqL+6uuQhdP27xCuKH0 T9EWU/SwGJA+NqQbHMZsJkHotqB2yYbklnJpyDlq55Nm+RDxGA LhQFVm11l9m0ZYXAMlaLlkX7m2mYUWEU+wGSJyGpa6LoXwZf4u qayuKQOio0wnNFWTZAr23o+sL9xYOHiNFonAGgPVb5daTMKD21 U+M5/2R57z4lpd14tVX74q6J5P3nTAAkMbOv8vmo5fJKWeaXAY TlXDkiHPnl9WHNGaqoFyPfwi4CY+c0rMH0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 212.227.17.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153338 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi StefanMo! 5 days ago Stefan Monnier wrote: >> No setf-method known for testcover-after >=20 > Does one of the 2 patches work? I tried the second patch with the trunk Emacs. It works for me. > My 1st patch has the downside that it doesn't call testcover-after at all. This is certainly not what to do. > The reason is that I don't know what VAL to set in IDX when we do > things like (push VAL (testcover-after IDX PLACE)): should it be the > value read before pushing VAL onto it, or the value set afterwards? > The second patch chooses to call testcover-after when setting the value. I'm not sure whether this reflects our latest discussion. If not I'm now ready to test another patch. Gr=FC=DFe Stefan --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBUFWWqQnTZgC3zSk5AQKQsAP/bfpKF3m22T5Zl/FJz7zMpEWFoegGGvzl C+wJ0ckf9w/zZTUvrHcbKIwiwjrNOEnreTjtbt6djkEHzsPmtZuthQFx0f4FFAc0 JI/PZ5Al0xb2MTOx5ziG8+YX0IWxoElBxt5ZTgAce/1LOQ/+s8XXNJOZQAmlyepv dxIyoLC6jbc= =Izi6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--