From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: neverov_dg@nkmk.ru Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re[2]: Latest emacs snapshots max CPU on XP Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:09:25 +0700 Organization: nkmk Message-ID: <1285887859.20070302080925@nkmk.ru> References: Reply-To: Неверов Дмитрий NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172797796 10195 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2007 01:09:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:09:56 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 02 02:09:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMwHN-0000bF-Or for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:09:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMwHN-0002V8-95 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:09:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMwH7-0002TW-Os for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:09:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMwH6-0002T8-9t for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:09:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMwH6-0002T5-0D for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:09:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.nkmk.ru ([62.231.186.17]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMwH5-0004l1-7e for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:09:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.nkmk.ru (root@localhost) by ns.nkmk.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id l2219U5x050470 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:09:30 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from neverov_dg@nkmk.ru) Original-Received: from bsd4.kmk (bsd4.kmk [200.1.1.54]) by ns.nkmk.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2219S6H050462 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:09:29 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from neverov_dg@nkmk.ru) Original-Received: from bsd4.kmk (root@localhost) by bsd4.kmk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id l2219Sei054522 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:09:28 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from neverov_dg@nkmk.ru) Original-Received: from nd.nkmk.ru (nd.nkmk.ru [10.40.8.178]) by bsd4.kmk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l2219PHB054512 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:09:25 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from neverov_dg@nkmk.ru) X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Anti-Virus for MailServers 5.5.2/RELEASE, bases: 01032007 #259678, status: clean X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:41579 Archived-At: Hi! I had the same problem. Try to put this in your .emacs: (setq semantic-idle-scheduler-idle-time 432000) I found it in the CEDET mail list. > I found the problem!! > After commenting and uncommenting various pieces of my various > configuration files (many MANY configuration files :) > The CPU hog was the CEDET library I was using for my ECB installation. > Apparently the semantic parser was going wild with the new version. > I've disabled the CEDET and ECB packages until I can track down the > actual culprit. There's been no update for some time in CEDET, so I > may look for alternatives for java programming. > In the meantime, I'm switching from gnuserv to emacsclient. Thanks for > all of your help! > - Chris > "Juanma Barranquero" writes: >> On 2/28/07, Chris McMahan wrote: >> >>> I've used pre-compiled XP binaries and compiled my own using MinGW, >>> and both will suddenly start using up 60-80% of my CPU resources. I've >>> not been able to correlate any specific activities with this behavior. >> >> Could you please try adding >> >> (setq jit-lock-stealth-time nil) >> >> to your .emacs and report whether it helps? >> >>> The pre-compiled version I'm currently using does not have this >>> problem >>> - GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2006-06-04 on TPAD >> >> There's quit a lot of changes between that version and the current >> pretest. When did you start to notice the problem? >> >> Do you load many buffers, particularly many buffers with complex >> fontification (source code, etc.)? >> >> Juanma >> >> ---- Dmitry