From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alp=C3=A1r_?= =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCttner?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:42:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1284878538.3330.73.camel__47260.1755908274$1284918060$gmane$org@piko.site> References: <1284716487.5481.61.camel@piko.site> <83pqwc1t9p.fsf@gnu.org> <1284731388.5452.8.camel@piko.site> <83eics1guw.fsf@gnu.org> <1284783571.3343.8.camel@piko.site> <83mxrfz9se.fsf@gnu.org> <1284873853.3330.55.camel@piko.site> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284918060 7684 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 17:41:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, 7053@debbugs.gnu.org, dominik@science.uva.nl To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 19:40:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxNsn-0007nR-Im for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:40:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44659 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxNsm-00071y-PD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51144 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxNsf-000704-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxNse-0005Tz-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53637) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxNse-0005Tv-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxNjB-0004Sd-P3; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alp=C3=A1r_?= =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCttner?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7053.128491742017136 (code B ref 7053); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2010 17:30:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxNiW-0004SL-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:30:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxDZ5-0007LK-N8 for 7053@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 02:39:56 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so222711fxm.3 for <7053@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:42:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WNBZVi1bsdjUCNlS6ZPVIH7xen3v+WFoz5qy6LzT9wE=; b=sc7+sB466s12/pTi6km8Sg6kzqGEnaBO6lhpeDXa27W2c9HJ3MlWtb83CjhCf9U0Am mEgEp7qlWOcgdCrhmjHLFq/MEyTWaSTUlTLc4k1hz82AYm7EJIcX60Jlwn/rQy2yWAzI EIRr1t2yVB/ob9lmD3lKMSjzP0zOderTIISGU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=MeHALMd+Kx6s7YcsvVYWI7QrdyWAv0KcK/mSuDYaUKLSQo09OQ51UxWrY9j63Ioxtd jGCOfeE8/Au/6jcEUoERUogW2WL//FSOaiwbsk5/d6UctN8ATmLoRRkrSGp7gsr/ahcu 9n+lZSBP7lbRowOUS2QsdUDJobS6f6KJAKjOM= Original-Received: by 10.223.126.208 with SMTP id d16mr3165793fas.14.1284878541692; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] (82-131-135-89.pool.invitel.hu [82.131.135.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm2356055fak.22.2010.09.18.23.42.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:42:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:30:19 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:31:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40306 Archived-At: > > I try to avoid to do it as far as I can. I'm a big fan of distributed > > version control systems. I use hg in several project with grate success > > and satisfaction. I people have also very good experience with git. > > > > But bzr is so much pain to use. A 'bzr pull' triggers tens of MB net > > traffic every time (and takes long minutes), operations that are > > instantaneous on hg/git takes ages here (log, update, status, diff). > > If you have a bzr repository on your machine, then "bzr bisect" is a > local operation that doesn't involve any network traffic or > negotiation with the remote repository. I know that. I meant I try to use bzr for nothing else that is absolute necessary to get the latest dev version. > So there's no reason not to > use "bzr bisect". I feel there are many good reasons not to use bzr at all. There are much better alternatives. But it is very off topic here, so please forget about my enthusiastic expression of my dissatisfaction with bzr. Sorry for the noise. Regards, Alpar