From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alp=C3=A1r_?= =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCttner?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.auctex.devel Subject: bug#7053: Reftex is fully broken Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:24:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1284873853.3330.55.camel@piko.site> References: <1284716487.5481.61.camel@piko.site> <83pqwc1t9p.fsf@gnu.org> <1284731388.5452.8.camel@piko.site> <83eics1guw.fsf@gnu.org> <1284783571.3343.8.camel@piko.site> <83mxrfz9se.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284874864 24077 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 05:41:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, 7053@debbugs.gnu.org, Carsten Dominik To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 07:41:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCe2-0006Qp-Nm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:40:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxCe1-0007s0-IK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44622 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxCds-0007rr-Gt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCdr-0001k4-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCdr-0001jw-9i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:40:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCSU-0006ub-6E; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alp=C3=A1r_?= =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCttner?= Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7053.128487409226558 (code B ref 7053); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 05:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2010 05:28:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCRf-0006uJ-Ox for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:28:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxCLX-0006rc-3N for 7053@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so212785fxm.3 for <7053@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:24:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I85z3mMbGHGOOCiBzYeIidRahIQ8gST78KaVa0vhidA=; b=DQmCR0hhiq06rquI2mSVQu24lVzhUXy4sFIQk/iAj4/tWf2hEV/9QIh7MBh74ISfpa krqGTYZSNJ1ZoZa0Imcs+AFAA06QGaUA+n82hI5RCbdN0m8sSRWrCh2i1MX1i6UAsJrN TkdN0m2fm9D5+cNMZg7XZ9j5LAcB0HEKLnslg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=AI9mgrFc1AtJ2Y+51OeTu7ylUKLkdWoj6GHbTWNEJdu/NOF8k4ZtCFDC15tHO8/PMJ TNfLNISvfQrIXThE3h1NwuCly6tkP2iBZx4FJn/47fszMoolrC8qnEmtOVkClb6B3S/L watACzX6DHGdeIGYdDDxcMvHFDMOpevZ40jQk= Original-Received: by 10.223.104.14 with SMTP id m14mr3071853fao.95.1284873856949; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] (87.97.51.154.pool.invitel.hu [87.97.51.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm2334987fak.46.2010.09.18.22.24.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:24:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mxrfz9se.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.2 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:28:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 01:29:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40302 gmane.emacs.auctex.devel:2512 Archived-At: > Thanks. It sounds like the problem is in reftex-what-macro. I'm > CC'ing the reftex author and maintainers in the hope that they can > find the culprit. > > Failing that, perhaps you could do a "bzr bisect" to find the revision > which broke reftex. I try to avoid to do it as far as I can. I'm a big fan of distributed version control systems. I use hg in several project with grate success and satisfaction. I people have also very good experience with git. But bzr is so much pain to use. A 'bzr pull' triggers tens of MB net traffic every time (and takes long minutes), operations that are instantaneous on hg/git takes ages here (log, update, status, diff). I simply can't understand why emacs chose bzr. Regards, Alpar > > Thanks. > > > > > Lisp Backtrace: > > "forward-sexp" (0xbfffc9b4) > > "backward-sexp" (0xbfffcae4) > > ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- > > "latex-backward-sexp-1" (0xbfffcc24) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffccd0) > > "latex-forward-sexp" (0xbfffcf64) > > "forward-sexp" (0xbfffd094) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffd140) > > "up-list" (0xbfffd3e4) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffd490) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffd6b0) > > "reftex-what-macro" (0xbfffd924) > > "reftex-label-location" (0xbfffda64) > > "reftex-label-info" (0xbfffdba4) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffdc60) > > "reftex-parse-from-file" (0xbfffdef4) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffdfa0) > > "reftex-do-parse" (0xbfffe174) > > "reftex-access-scan-info" (0xbfffe2a4) > > "reftex-toc" (0xbfffe414) > > "call-interactively" (0xbfffe5ac) > > (gdb) > > > > And here is another one (typing \ref{valami}, it also freezes reftex): > > > > Lisp Backtrace: > > "up-list" (0xbfffcea4) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffcf50) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffd170) > > "reftex-what-macro" (0xbfffd3e4) > > "reftex-what-macro-safe" (0xbfffd514) > > "reftex-view-crossref" (0xbfffd654) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffd700) > > "reftex-view-crossref-when-idle" (0xbfffda48) > > "apply" (0xbfffda44) > > "byte-code" (0xbfffdaf0) > > "timer-event-handler" (0xbfffdd94) > > (gdb) > > > > Regards, > > Alpar > > > > >