From: "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@siege-engine.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de>,
XEmacs-Beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: simplifying beginning-of-defun
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:20:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254136813.6168.160.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvk4zjbtrg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 00:06 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > Of course, the need here would be pretty basic stuff too if it was
> > robust to the actual landing place being different for different
> > situations, sort of the way narrow-to-defun might not care exactly where
> > it lands, so long as it goes somewhere.
>
> Very much so, indeed.
> I'd say that pretty much all calls to beginning-of-defun(-raw) should
> follow this principle.
I think this sums up our difference in opinion. If this is true, then
none of my previous arguments make sense. If this is not the case, then
the code that does depend on very specific behaviors from
beginning-of-defun will break if CEDET were to change them.
I'll follow whichever convention you like.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-28 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-26 17:52 simplifying beginning-of-defun Andreas Roehler
2009-09-26 21:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-27 8:10 ` Andreas Roehler
2009-09-27 18:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-28 6:50 ` Andreas Roehler
2009-09-28 22:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-29 6:53 ` Andreas Roehler
2009-09-29 8:29 ` Andreas Roehler
2009-09-27 10:26 ` Andreas Roehler
2009-09-27 11:17 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-09-27 18:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-27 20:07 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-09-27 22:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-28 2:04 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2009-09-28 4:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-28 11:20 ` Eric M. Ludlam [this message]
2009-09-29 6:50 ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-09-27 19:06 ` Glenn Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254136813.6168.160.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com \
--to=eric@siege-engine.com \
--cc=XEmacs-Beta@xemacs.org \
--cc=andreas.roehler@online.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.