From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M\. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recognize mbox files? Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:45:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1234424735.136207.2494.nullmailer@beryx.hq.kred> Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234424753 16418 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2009 07:45:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, stephen@xemacs.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 12 08:47:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LXWHr-0007IW-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:47:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXWGX-0007Bx-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXWGT-0007Bf-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LXWGQ-0007BH-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57878 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LXWGQ-0007BE-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:38 -0500 Original-Received: from hq.kreditor.se ([213.136.42.58]:2348 helo=auxid.hq.kred) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LXWGO-0007l9-VD; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:45:37 -0500 Original-Received: by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix, from userid 118) id 8F5DF1379DB3; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:45:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from beryx.hq.kred (unknown [10.16.0.106]) by auxid.hq.kred (Postfix) with SMTP id 786A51379B40; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:45:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (nullmailer pid 2495 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:45:35 -0000 In-reply-to: message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:18:44 +0200 Original-References: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109014 Archived-At: > Otherwise, Rmail will have to be considered risky for use by mail > admins. Heh, what it does nowadays is nothing compared with what it did before the mbox merge: it would convert the file to Babyl! How's that for ``risky''? But only if you explicitly did "C-u M-x rmail FILE", it would do nothing if you just opened a mbox file.