From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Derick Eddington Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1534: Font lock decoration levels mismatch? Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:51:33 -0800 Message-ID: <1228938693.24919.50.camel@eep> Reply-To: Derick Eddington , 1534@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229008274 14500 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2008 15:11:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:11:14 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 16:12:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LAnD3-0001wz-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:12:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45049 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAnBr-0002ZH-SC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:10:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAVIE-0008PJ-NL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAVID-0008OZ-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59477 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAVID-0008OU-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:04:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:35229) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAVIC-0004e0-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:04:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBAK4IwQ023598; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:04:18 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBAK04nY022229; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:00:04 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Derick Eddington Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:00:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1534 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122893870520261 (code B ref -1); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:00:04 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 53; hammy, 110; neutral, 53; spammy, 5. spammytokens:0.997-1--decoration, 0.987-1--indexing, 0.987-1--basics, 0.987-1--Basics, 0.857-+--UD:com hammytokens:0.000-+--emacs, 0.000-+--Emacs, 0.000-+--gnu, 0.000-+--GNU, 0.000-+--HDKIM-Signature:sk:content Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 10 Dec 2008 19:51:45 +0000 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBAJpf7v020247 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:51:42 -0800 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAV5x-0004j3-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LAV5w-0004ir-Ou for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45606 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LAV5w-0004io-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.152]:29717) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LAV5w-0002Hj-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so317297yxf.66 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:51:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X8KTrq9Nbcnh1PgxvPTWwQQVftAk8OWJuOd2ESF3ZP4=; b=XNvba8vo/aaS3rqdEq/Ag/5D/xQ+s0S26RWqJGo7nDa9I7LHZTPcSh/TQoMqgEdowR P3Tgcf9bhGRtJRTn5QfvqSRaKm06Z8pMa1jeRO3wUkIZA3ZwU5M7yrCOMFE9h5FQjszG xJTLVafjl+R+eELghDPkiBx5c7hT0oFOhYhhI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=r58/NGgR71fZMKWaHTLkZDXFf8bZD/dcRXfS4F+D3g2nzyTGPW4Uq/YqAEup028Vie 9TPohzFTy4nFFp83f73H60kYsAOF/kMAXQcaYckCWjyT+R39KhjgLAnNSikLjiHJMTsi +oZBfrd1dML2KH92+8lBcE7+RkxYlVgzkdHfo= Original-Received: by 10.143.160.1 with SMTP id m1mr371342wfo.2.1228938697909; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:51:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.1.2? (pool-173-51-86-88.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [173.51.86.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm1075475wff.17.2008.12.10.11.51.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:51:36 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:04:22 -0500 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:09:38 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23173 Archived-At: I'm using: GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.3) of 2008-10-13 on rothera, modified by Debian The documentation at "23.6.1 Font Lock Basics" and "23.6.5 Levels of Font Lock" refers to level numbers starting at 1, but when I customize the level for a specific mode (one I'm still developing) the number given to Customize is 0-based not 1-based; i.e., my `font-lock-defaults' `KEYWORDS' member is like `(level-1 level-2 level-3 level-4)' and, e.g., to make Customize use level-3 I have to tell it the number 2. Should Customize do 1-based indexing instead so it corresponds to the documentation, or the documentation use 0-based? -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------